Back to Blog
Baklava

Don't Cry, Nor Surrender: It's Your Data

VeraLex Team••7 min read

Amazon, Temu, and Alibaba—these are the massive e-commerce platforms people use for everyday life: nail clippers, shoes, TVs, everything. And it's not a joke anymore. One-night or one-day delivery has basically become a new normal for our generation (yes, I'm 31).

Coupang sits in that same category. It's incorporated in the U.S., but the real engine is South Korea, where Coupang is so dominant that it feels like more than half the country has ordered from it at least once.

Why This Matters

And that's why this matters. According to media reports, Coupang has recently faced scrutiny over a reported large-scale personal data exposure, which triggered public backlash and a serious government response. Some reports suggest that the exposure may have involved tens of millions of accounts, and the investigation and pressure from Korean authorities are still ongoing.

I'm not going to walk through every detail of the incident. I want to focus on one question that feels more real to everyday people: How are we going to react to this? Are people in South Korea actually going to stop using Coupang, or will this be one of those "everyone is angry for a month" situations where convenience wins again?

Yes, there's also an interesting legal angle here—like whether a U.S. court would enforce a Korean court judgment, especially if it's monetary. But that's a question better handled by legal professionals focused on cross-border enforcement. I'm writing this as a casual blog writer, not trying to brief a court.

The Compensation Question

One concrete thing worth mentioning is the compensation plan Coupang has announced. According to media coverage, it is reportedly valued at about 1.69 trillion won (roughly $1.18 billion), covering an estimated 33.7 million accounts, with vouchers of 50,000 won per account.

Critics are already calling it weak—mainly because the compensation is mostly redeemable only on Coupang itself. From a consumer perspective, it feels less like accountability and more like being nudged back into the same ecosystem.

So What Do People Do Now?

I genuinely don't know. But if we're being realistic, I think public reaction will fall into a couple of predictable patterns.

Pattern 1: The Boycott

"I'm done with Coupang." Some people will absolutely try.

The problem is that boycotts only last when people can actually switch without making their daily life harder. If your normal is fast delivery, reliable service, and a platform that's basically built into your routines, then the alternative has to be just as frictionless—or the boycott becomes more of a moment than a movement.

There's also another uncomfortable layer. Even when data exposure is suspected, the sense that the data is already out there is hard to shake. Address, order history, phone numbers—once people believe that information has been exposed, you can't rewind time. People can demand better security and stronger privacy practices going forward, but for most individuals that still feels abstract, because they don't have a direct control lever over what already happened.

Pattern 2: The "More Aware" Path

The second reaction is what I'd call the "more aware" path—even if it sounds a little ironic. If I were them, I think this is the more realistic direction. People become more attentive and more educated about data privacy and breaches.

And yes, it sounds contradictory. How can we be more attentive when the whole point is that individual people can't control giant systems?

But here's what I mean. Data surrounding AI and big tech isn't a Hogwarts spell. It's not magic. It's literally made from you, me, and us. The source of the data isn't some imaginary entity. It's regular people living regular lives: uploading, clicking, ordering, signing up, and saying "agree" without thinking too hard because the convenience is right there.

So even if one person can't force a platform to change overnight, growing awareness still has power. It shifts norms. It raises expectations. It increases pressure. And over time, it changes what companies can get away with collecting and how seriously they treat the consequences when things go wrong.

Our Perspective

In our case, as a legal-tech platform, we do not provide legal advice or representation. Our goal is to help people better understand procedural paths and connect with appropriate legal professionals when data-related issues arise.

My Honest Take

My honest opinion is that Coupang usage probably won't collapse. Not because people don't care, but because switching costs are real. Convenience is addictive, and Coupang is embedded in daily life in a way that makes a total boycott hard to sustain.

What I think happens instead is short-term outrage followed by normalization—unless new facts keep dripping out and reigniting anger. The trust damage will show up quietly:

And that voucher-only compensation is a reputational trap. Even if it's legally framed as compensation, it feels like: "We're compensating you, but only inside our ecosystem." Which reads less like justice and more like a retention strategy.

The Bigger Picture

In the long run, regulatory pressure is likely the bigger threat than customer churn. Government response, penalties, and ongoing scrutiny can reshape the baseline for what negligence costs in Korea—even if most customers eventually keep shopping.

The real question isn't whether people will keep using Coupang. It's whether incidents like this will finally push both consumers and regulators to demand higher standards for data protection—standards that actually have teeth.

Because at the end of the day, it's your data. Don't cry. Don't surrender. Stay informed, stay aware, and know your options.

This article provides general commentary on consumer data privacy issues. For specific legal concerns about data breaches or privacy violations, consult with a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction.